The Syllabus Should Be Checked At Least Once A Week In Case There Are Revisions.
 
Christian Ethics Syllabus
RPH 320
9:30-10:45 a.m., Tue/Thur
Dr. Paul Custodio Bube  
Spring 2007

 

Office Hours: Lyon 321
MWF: 10:00-10:50 a.m. & 1:30-2:30 p.m.
TTh: 1:30-2:30 p.m.
or by appointment
Phone: 698-4351

E-mail: Click on Mailbox to e-mail professorHH01580A.gif (1311 bytes)

 

Educator is at 

[Tip: If you wish to print out the syllabus, check your printer options to see if you can print in black and white or grayscale or without the background.]

Nature and Purpose of Course:

There are a variety of ways to study Christian Ethics. One approach is to look at the history and development of Christian ethical thinking from the earliest Christian writers (the New Testament writers) to the present. Another way is to examine various “types” of Christian ethical theories, e.g., Christian Realism, Narrative Ethics, Liberation Theology, etc. A third way is to start with ethical issues that have been important to Christians—such as poverty, war, and abortion—and examine the way various Christians have dealt with them. Each approach has its strengths and weaknesses. This course will combine aspects of all of these approaches in an effort to appreciate the development, diversity, and unique concerns that have characterized Christian ethics.

Objectives:

Upon successful completion of this course students will be able to

Required Readings:

Christian Ethics: An Essential Guide by Robin W. Lovin
Bible and Ethics in the Christian Life by Bruce C. Birch & Larry L. Rasmussen
Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics by Reinhold Niebuhr (This book can be found in its entirety on-line at: http://www.religion-online.org/cgi-bin/relsearchd.dll/showbook?item_id=411 ) or ordered through the bookstore
A Black Theology of Liberation by James H. Cone
A Community of Character by Stanley Hauerwas
Why We’re Equal: Introducing Feminist Theology by Val Web

Requirements:

As an upper level RPH course, there will be a fair amount of reading and writing involved in our study. We have six books that we will read all or most of. There will be a take-home essay exam on each book. The final exam is to be a group project/presentation. Groups may be as small as 2 persons and as large as 4. Students will research a topic chosen from a list I will provide, explain the ethical problems raised by the topic, and how Niebuhr, Cone, Webb, and Hauerwas, have or might deal with the topic. E.g., if the topic were capital punishment, how would each of these Christian ethicists analyze the issue and what would they say is the right thing to do? In light of that discussion, how would the members of the group respond to the issue? Each group will have approximately 40 minutes for this presentation. Think of it as a way of teaching the class about the topic, and be sure to provide handouts and/or do “PowerPoint” type of presentations that would help your classmates better understand the issues.

Students are expected to write e-journals in response to questions found on the syllabus and under the "Assignments" section of Educator. Journal responses need only be a couple of paragraphs.

Christian ethics is not only concerned with knowing about right and wrong and good and bad from a Christian perspective, it is also concerned with doing what is right and promoting what is good. For that reason, this course will include a service component of 10 hours. Students may choose where they do their service hours and whether they want to do all 10 hours at one location or split the hours up among two or more locations. The choice of locations is also open, but should be with an organization that is largely motivated by a Christian commitment to service. Some examples of where students might work include: Help and Hope; a local church that has an outreach program (e.g., an after school program, day care, health clinic, domestic violence center, Help and Hope, etc.); or an interdenominational or nondenominational agency. A good place to get a list of possible places to do service would be through the LOVE office or Campus Ministry Board which sets up the Fall Service Day. STUDENTS MUST GET MY APPROVAL FOR WHERE THEY DO THEIR SERVICE HOURS IN ADVANCE. For each hour of service, the student should e-mail me about what they did, who they interacted with, and in what ways the work of this organization reflects the views of Christian ethics we are covering in the course (or how the particular view might interpret the work of the organization). (E.g., do people work here because they are obeying a command by God or they have been inspired by the example of someone else?) I should receive at least 10 e-mails for this assignment -- one for each hour of service. These e-mails are not the same as the students' e-journals. Students will also need to get some official signature from the supervisor or other responsible person at the organization indicating they have put in the hours they report.

Grading:

Take-home Exams: 60%
E-journals: 15%
Service Hours: 10%
Final Project: 15%
 
 

COLLABORATION: Students are encouraged to help each other in preparing for exams and exchanging ideas and advice on papers. However, in keeping with the Lyon Honor Code, actual written work on exams and e-mail journals are to be done by the student her or himself.

 

bd14578_.gif (200 bytes)bd14578_.gif (200 bytes)bd14578_.gif (200 bytes)bd14578_.gif (200 bytes)bd14578_.gif (200 bytes)bd14578_.gif (200 bytes)bd14578_.gif (200 bytes)

Please note: Students seeking reasonable accommodations based on documented learning disabilities should contact the Office of Academic Services at 698-4332.

bd14578_.gif (200 bytes)bd14578_.gif (200 bytes)bd14578_.gif (200 bytes)bd14578_.gif (200 bytes)bd14578_.gif (200 bytes)bd14578_.gif (200 bytes)bd14578_.gif (200 bytes)

Weekly Assignments:
 
(Students should have all of each assignment read by the first day that it will be discussed.)
 
Jan. 9
Introduction to course
 
 
Jan. 11-18
Read pp. 7-60 of Christian Ethics: An Essential Guide by Robin W. Lovin [click here for slides]
E-journal#1: Respond to the following questions--
From a religious standpoint, what is your life's goal?
How does that goal relate to God's goals?
What rules do you think are fundamental for Christians to follow and why? Due by 5:00 p.m. Jan. 18.
 
 
Jan. 23-25
Read pp. 61-125 of Christian Ethics: An Essential Guide by Robin W. Lovin [click here for slides]
E-journal#2: Respond to the following-- Outside of persons mentioned in the Bible, whose story inspires you as an example of a good life? What virtues do they model? (This could be someone you know personally or someone you know about, e.g., through reading) Due by 5:00 p.m. Jan. 25
 
 
Jan. 30
Conclude discussion of Lovin's book [First take-home exam distributed on Jan. 30 and due back by 5:00 p.m. on Feb. 4.  E-mail the exam as a Word attachment.]
 
 
Feb. 1-6
Read pp. 7-65 of Bible and Ethics in the Christian Life by Bruce C. Birch & Larry L. Rasmussen
[click here for slides on chs. 1&2]
E-journal#3: Read the mountain-climbing story on pp. 52-53 of Birch & Rasmussen. From a perspective informed by the whole Bible, how would you act in this situation? Due by 5:00 p.m. Feb. 6
 
Feb. 8-13
Read pp. 141-202 of Bible and Ethics in the Christian Life by Bruce C. Birch & Larry L. Rasmussen [slides for ch. 8] [slides for chs.9 & 10]
 
[Second take-home exam distributed on Feb. 13 and due back by 5:00 on Feb. 18]
 
 
Feb. 15-20
Read Introduction and chs. 1-5 of Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics by Reinhold Niebuhr at: http://www.religion-online.org/showbook.asp?title=411)
E-journal#4: Niebuhr argues that the morality of a group will inevitably be inferior to the morality of an individual. Why do you think he says that and do you agree or disagree? Due by 5:00 p.m. Feb. 20
 
 
Feb. 22-Feb. 27
Read chs. 6-10 of of Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics by Reinhold Niebuhr
[Third take-home exam distributed on Feb. 27, due back 5:00 p.m. on Mar 2]
 
 
Mar. 1
Read “The Gospel and the Liberation of the Poor” by James Cone at http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=1696
 
 
Mar. 5-9:
SPRING BREAK
 
 
Mar. 13-15
pp. 1-39 in A Black Theology of Liberation by James Cone. (Do not read the prefaces at this time.)
E-journal#5: In what ways does Cone seem similar to Niebuhr and in what ways different? Who do you find more compelling? Due by 5:00 p.m. Mar. 13
 
 
Mar. 20-22
Read pp. 40-128 in A Black Theology of Liberation by James Cone. (Read the prefaces after reading the text.)
[Fourth take-home exam distributed on Mar. 20 and due back 5:00 p.m. on Mar. 25]
 
 
Mar. 27-Mar. 29
Read pp. 1-52 in A Community of Character by Stanley Hauerwas
E-journal#6: What do you think of Hauerwas's analysis of Watership Down? Do you think it is relevant to Christian ethics? Can you think of other literature that could be analyzed this way? Due by 5:00 p.m. Mar. 27
 
 
Apr. 3-5
Read pp. 196-229 in A Community of Character by Stanley Hauerwas
[Fifth take-home exam distributed on Apr. 3 and due back 5:00 p.m. Apr. 10]
 
 
Apr. 10-12
Read the Preface and pp. 1-80 in Why We’re Equal: Introducing Feminst Theology by Val Web
E-journal#7: After reading this section of Val Webb's book, would you consider yourself a feminist? Why or why not? Due by 5:00 p.m. Apr. 11 (Wednesday)
 
 
Apr. 19-24
Read pp. 81-145 in Why We’re Equal: Introducing Feminst Theology by Val Web
[Sixth take-home exam distributed on Apr. 19 and due back 5:00 p.m. Apr. 22]
 
 
Apr.  Apr. 26
Catch up & Review
 
 
May 1 (8 a.m. - 10 a.m.)
Presentations aka Final Exam

 

Hit Counter