Working Syllabus Draft
Business and Professional Ethics
RPH 270
MWF 11:00-11:50 a.m
Fall, 2009
E-mail: Click on Mailbox to e-mail
professor
![]()
Nature and Purpose of the Course:
This is a course in Applied Ethics, that is, a course which examines how ethical theories can be applied to concrete situations and issues. As a course in the Religion and Philosophy Department, this class will emphasize critical reasoning and analysis in the study of ethical theory and issues. The aim of this course is to introduce students to basic concepts and theories in philosophical ethics and to apply those concepts and theories to concrete issues and cases in the areas of business. Students who are concentrating in Environmental Studies will have opportunities to explore issues in environmental ethics. Since many of the issues of environmental ethics are intimately related to business and economic interests, the overlap between business and environmental ethics will be an ongoing topic of discussion throughout the course.
Course Objectives:
Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to
1. Define key terms associated with business and professional ethics;
2. Analyze and evaluate various ethical theories as they relate to business issues;
3. Apply ethical theories and concepts to concrete issues and cases in the areas of business;
4. Research and take a stand on an issue and support that stand using facts relevant to the ethical approaches used.
Text:
Business Ethics Concepts and Cases by Manuel Velasquez
Supporting Website: http://wps.prenhall.com/hss_velasquez_busethics_6/
Requirements:
Grades will be based upon four exams and a final; several case analyses presentations (done with a partner), a 4000-5000 word social responsibility analysis of a Fortune 500 company. [All written work should be printed double-spaced, 12 pt. font, with one-inch margins. I do not mind students going over the suggested page limit as long as what they write is pertinent to the assignment.]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grading Scale: A=90-100; B=80-89; C=70-79; D=60-69; F=0-59
Collaboration: One's ethical reflection about real life issues does not usually occur in isolation from others. If we are facing dilemmas at our job, in our personal life, or in our social setting, we generally talk about these dilemmas with others. For that reason, I would hope that students would collaborate with each other as they study for exams and prepare written work and projects for the course. In many cases collaboration will be required in an assigned presentation. However, I do expect that each student will write his or her own final drafts of essays, as well as take his or her own exams. For example, talking together about how to approach an essay, exchanging ideas, etc., is encouraged, but each student will write his or her own work in his or her own words and pledge them in accordance with the Lyon College Honor Pledge.
Case Analyses/Presentations involve two-to-three students working together on an assigned case study. Each analysis should explain to the rest of the class the important ethical issues raised by the case in light of the chapter that the case is related to. Students are encouraged to find updated information pertaining to the case (all the cases in the text are actual). The presentation should take approximately 40 minutes, not including time for interaction with the rest of the class. There is no one set format--students may want to provide a pro/con debate on issues raised by the case, provide a straightforward explanation of what the case entails ethically, or perhaps dramatize an aspect of the case in order to explicate key ethical issues and concepts. See the Guidelines for Case Analysis/Presentation at
http://www.lyon.edu/webdata/groups/rph/rph270/caseanalysis.htm .The essay analyzing the social responsibility of a Fortune 500 company is also fairly open-ended. However, students should read a sample Social & Environmental Assessment Report from the Ben & Jerry's website at http://www.benjerry.com/company/sear/ in order to get an idea of what a social responsibility analysis might look like. In addition, ethical issues raised by practices, investments, etc., of one's chosen company, should be related to relevant concepts and discussions from our book and the class. Students may want to choose which Fortune 500 company early, since when a company is chosen, no one else may do her/his analysis on that company. If the student chooses to analyze a significant bioethics issue, she/he needs to negotiate the topic with me. Whatever topic a student chooses -- business or bioethical -- students must clear the topic with the professor no later than fall break.
Attendance Policy: Every student is expected to attend all classes and turn in all assignments on time. Good attendance is worth 5% of the attendance/participation grade (Good attendance is having no unexcused absences. Normally, an absence is excused only in advance of the absence, and always at the professor's discretion.) Good attendance will, of course, also enhance the student's ability to succeed in the course, whereas multiple absences will almost always cause a student to do poorly on exams. Late assignments will be graded down five points for each day late.
CELL PHONES, COMPUTERS, AND OTHER ELECTRONICS: Cell phones should either be turned off or put on silent or vibrate in class. They should be put away and not visible. Texting during class is not permitted. If you are awaiting an emergency call, then you should sit near the class entrance, and when your phone vibrates, you should quietly exit and take your call in the hallway out of earshot of the class. Students may use computers in class to keep notes only (unless directed by the professor). Listening to iPods or other mp3 or similar players is prohibited in class. Violation of these requirements will adversely affect your participation/attendance grade for the class.
Credit for Economics, Accounting, & Business Majors: This course is designed to meet a major or minor elective at the 300 level for students in Economics, Accounting, and Business. Blanket approval by the college is pending, however, students may petition to have this course approved by completing a petition form and having signed by me and their advisor.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Please note: Students seeking reasonable accommodations based on documented learning disabilities should contact the Office of Academic Services at 307-7332.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
COURSE SCHEDULE
(Readings should be completed before the first date they are assigned.)
What is Professional Ethics?
| Aug. 26-28 | Introductory sessions; overview of class and the nature of ethics and the nature of professions [click here for class slides] |
Ethics and Business
| Aug. 31 |
Read pp. 1-55 in Velasquez |
| Sept. 2-4 | Continued Discussion of Chapter One |
| Sept. 7 | LABOR DAY -- No Classes |
| Sept. 9 | Discussion of Enron case (pp. 53-55 in Velasquez) |
Ethical Principles in Business
| Sept. 11 |
Read pp. 57-122 in Velasquez [click here for class slides] |
| Sept. 14-16 | Continued Discussion of Chapter Two |
| Sept. 18 | Read story at http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/06/jammie-thomas-retrial-verdict.ars along with five links of the complete trial at the bottom of the page for discussion in class. |
Sept. 19: First Exam
due by 11:59 p.m. (log on to Educator after class Sept. 18 to take the exam; students should study the terminology found in the glossaries and be prepared to discuss cases)The Business System
| Sept. 21 | Read pp. 123-164 in Velasquez [click here for notes on Marx] |
| Sept. 23 | Continued Discussion of Chapter Three |
| Sept. 25 | Read "Collapse of Lehman Brothers" and "2007-08 Financial Crisis In Review" (found in Educator under Course Materials/Handouts) |
| Sept. 28 | Continued Discussion of Lehman Brothers & 2007-2008 Financial Collapse |
| Sept. 30 | Case Analysis/Presentation on "Glaxco Smith Kline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and AIDS in Africa" case (pp. 159-163) |
Ethics in the Marketplace
| Oct. 2-5 | Read pp. 165-204 in Velasquez |
| Oct. 7-9 | Continued Discussion of Chapter Four |
| Oct. 12 | Case Analysis/Presentation on "Playing Monopoly: Microsoft" (194-199 in Velasquez) or Reforming the American Medical System |
Oct. 12: Second Exam
due by 11:59 p.m. (log on to Educator to take the exam)Ethics and the Environment
| Oct. 14 | Read pp. 205-258 in Velasquez |
| Oct.15-16 | Fall Break |
| Oct. 19-23 | Continued Discussion of Chapter Five |
| Oct. 26 | Case Analysis/Presentation on "Gas or Grouse?" (254-257 in Velasquez) or |
Oct. 2
7: Third Exam due by 11:59 p.m. (Log onto Educator to take the exam)Ethics of Consumer Production and Marketing
| Oct. 28 | Read pp. 259-300 in Velasquez [Click here for slides on Consumer Production & Marketing] |
| Oct. 30-Nov. 2 | Continued Discussion of Chapter Six |
| Nov. 4 | Case Analysis/Presentation on Case of Health Care Business (found in Handouts folder of Educator Course Folder) |
Ethics of Job Discrimination
| Nov. 6 | Read pp. 301-348 in Velasquez; and following online articles: http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/fs-race.html, http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/fs-sex.html,and http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/fs-relig_ethnic.html. Click here for the slides relating to Job Discrimination |
| Nov. 9-13 | Continued Discussion of Chapter Seven |
| Nov. 16 | Case Analysis/Presentation on "Wal-Mart's Women" (344-348 in Velasquez) or The Tuskegee Syphilis Study |
Nov. 17
: Fourth Exam due by 11:59 p.m. (Log onto Educator to take the exam)
The Individual in the Organization
| Nov. 18 | Read pp. 349-406 in Velasquez |
| Nov. 20-23 | Continued Discussion of Chapter Eight |
| Nov. 23 | [If time] In-class activity -- playing Lockheed's "Graymatters" game at http://temp.onlineethics.org/corp/graymatters/case8.html |
| Nov. 25-28 | Thanksgiving Holiday. Students should use this time to work on their final presentations. |
Nov. 30 - Dec. 11 Each student will be assigned a class session to teach their SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY presentation.
Dec.
TBA Final Exam due by 11:59 p.m. (Log onto
© 2009 Paul Custodio Bube